Posts Tagged ‘Goldman Sachs’
I Want the Old Goldman Sachs Back!
By Morgan House
December 1, 2009
Over the past year, it’s been Us vs. Goldman Sachs. Conspiracy theories have multiplied aplenty. Loathing hasn’t been shy. Heads have been called for. That much is certain.
But what would a sensible Goldman Sachs look like? One that we could put up with, without being the butt of every egg-throwing anti-Wall Street protest imaginable? To answer that question, we might want to go back and look at the Goldman Sachs of years past, when it commanded respect.
Goldman Sachs went public in 1999. Before that, it was a private partnership, structured the same way many law firms and accounting firms are. Partners were senior employees who, after years of devastatingly long hours, were selected into a small fraternity of owners.
These partners owned the entire firm. All of the capital was theirs. They literally supplied it out of their own earned income. As Charles Ellis writes in his book, The Partnership: “Goldman Sachs retained most of each partner’s yearly earned income. As a result, anyone who became a partner in Goldman Sachs usually experienced a drop in spendable income.”
When the smart people works for Wall Street
Wall Street Smarts
Interesting opinion from a random guy the author met. I’ve never thought of this, but like him, I cannot find a compelling flaw to the theory. I am not sure what the smartest guys from my dad’s generation, born around war times, do as their profession. Maybe doctors, businessmen, teachers. Is there even a demand for banking people then? However, I do know that the smartest people works in banks now. Can’t imagine the cream of the crop working for the government or MAS…
Greed of Wall Street – Goldman Sachs
There has been much controversy over Goldman Sachs recent success despite the sub-prime, financial and subsequently economic crisis. I believe most of the fuss, at least at the consumer level came about with this piece by Matt Taibbi, writer with Rolling Stone. It is strange, I always thought Rolling Stone is a magazine only rockers and emo-kids get from HMV.
The Great American Bubble Machine
Gist of the article
Goldman has a part to play in the Great Depression by playing up investor sentiments thought layers of investment trust.
Goldman’s underwriting standard and tactics for IPO were questionable. Amidst all the enticement for investors to subscribe, they knew the companies were worthless and protected themselves from any losses.
Similarly, Goldman knew the sub-prime mortgages packaged into CDOs would default not long after they started structuring them. Goldman continued to sell them while having a short position in the CDOs.
Through influence they have in the US government, therefore regulations in commodities trading, they are able to manipulate the market. Goldman released analyst reports and forecast for oil to reach US$200 a barrel.
Through this influence too, they are able to rigging the bailout, receiving funds and payment from AIG, letting competitor Lehman Brothers collapse and finally totally unharmed and extremely profitable. Taibbi also has a problem with the fact that Goldman paid so little tax in 2008. US$14 million in tax while paying out $10 billion in compensation and benefits and made a profit of more than $2 billion.
The next big global bubble to be exploited is the carboncredit market. Goldman has been positioning itself to push for the legislative approval for the framework and opening a market for carboncredit. Same reason why oil trading disrupts supply/demand, Goldman wants a big slice of the pie.
Conclusion, Goldman has been inflating bubbles around the financial assets to profit from it and has influence to do so.
Nice piece, I wish I had the narrative gift of Taibbi. However, technically, it has a lot of flaws. Goldman is just better at making money this time round. Many financial institutions are involved in the tech bubble and oil trading as well, and profited from it. I believe that there might be some bending of ethical standards in Goldman’s pursuit of profits, but the conspiracy theory is hard to swallow. Furthermore, the much information and details are that are pieced together have little relevance to the issue.
If you are not afraid of being even more confuse, you can read a view by another columnist. Then again, I’m not sure she is in the finance profession.
